> This is a totally esoteric piece of info that probably very fewYes, there was. Genroku 1 was proclaimed on the 30th day of the ninth month of
> people would have any interest in, but I discovered it, so I'm
> sharin'!
>
> I happened to be looking at one of the stone lanterns that you find
> all over every corner of Japan, and this one happened to be on an
> island off the coast of Oita prefecture. Since the era name and date
> was still clear I made a note out of it out of curiosity just to see
> how old the thing was. It was marked "Jokyou 5". So I went to my
> computer, used my handy-dandy era converter, and lo and behold,
> the "Jokyo" era ended in the 4th year. There was no "Jokyou 5"!
> This is a totally esoteric piece of info that probably very fewDean Wayland
> people would have any interest in, but I discovered it, so I'm
> sharin'!
>
> I happened to be looking at one of the stone lanterns that you find
> all over every corner of Japan, and this one happened to be on an
> island off the coast of Oita prefecture. Since the era name and
> date
> was still clear I made a note out of it out of curiosity just to
> see
> how old the thing was. It was marked "Jokyou 5". So I went to my
> computer, used my handy-dandy era converter, and lo and behold,
> the "Jokyo" era ended in the 4th year. There was no "Jokyou 5"!
> Jokyo ended in the 4th year - 1687, and 1688 was the first year of
> Genroku. So I was perplexed, and I asked around. The answer was
> actually quite simple - islanders and other people in isolated
> vilages sometimes went 2 or 3 years before getting word that the
> era
> had changed, and so during that time any headstones or stone lamps
> or
> torii gates or other stone monuments that were created would be
> dated
> in the era the villagers THOUGHT it was. So they apparently hadnt
> gotten word that the Jokyou era had ended and the Genroku era had
> began.
>
> Just an interesting (well, I thought so, anyway) tidbit I came
> across
> during my travels.
>
>
>
> ---
> Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
> Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
> ---
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
> click here
> http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=295196.4901138.6071305.3001176/D=groups/S=:HM/A=2128215/rand=394536703
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
> Yes, there was. Genroku 1 was proclaimed on the 30th day of the
> ninth month of
> Jokyo 5. Everything up to that date was Jokyo 5. Everything after
> it was Genroku 1.
>
> When the last emperor died in 1989, you know 1989 was still the
> Shôwa Era -- and
> a few weeks later it became Heisei 1.
>
> Surely you don't think that eras change at midnight on Dec. 31. :)
>
>
> Tony
> Hi there Tony,That wouldn't surprise me at all -- It took how many days for the US as a whole
>
> That seems pretty straight forward in itself, but in a period when the
> fastest forms of communication was a ship or a horse, surely there must
> have been some kind of time lag, relative to the propagation rate of the
> news? Obviously the closer you are to the centres of power, the more up
> to date your calendar, but if you're out in the sticks/mountains/islands
> etc...?
> Surely you don't think that eras change at midnight on Dec. 31. :)Um, no, of course not...................
>
>
> Tony
> This is not uncommon in the dating of swords, examples of both may beYou know, I always thought good artisans were *ahead* of the times, not behind
> seen;
> Swords made in the early part of a year where there is a nengo change
> and examples of years that were never officially recognized because the
> nengo had changed but the smith had not got the word.
> That wouldn't surprise me at all -- It took how many days for the
> US as a whole
> to find out about Lincoln's assassination? -- but at the heart of
> that issue was
> a more basic question -- that there was, indeed, a Jokyô 5 -- for
> almost ten
> months.
>
> It was the same question that was driving everyone crazy in Japan
> in 1989, when
> Shôwa died (and before, when he was failing and people knew he
> would be dead
> soon). The government nearly ground to a halt as people were
> putting off
> ordering (and designing!) all new government forms that would have
> to have a NEW
> era name in a checkbox (for birthdates, registrations, etc.), and
> had no idea
> what the name was going to be, or when it was actually going to
> happen. New
> calendars needed to be printed, etc. Yeah, it was still Shôwa 65,
> but it was
> about to become something else, too. :)
>
> Tony
> Hi there Tony,the
>
> That seems pretty straight forward in itself, but in a period when
> fastest forms of communication was a ship or a horse, surely theremust
> have been some kind of time lag, relative to the propagation rateof the
> news? Obviously the closer you are to the centres of power, themore up
> to date your calendar, but if you're out in thesticks/mountains/islands
> etc...?That was basically what I was getting at, I just apparently used a
>
> Yours
>
> Dean