Home - Back

Re: Digest Number 784

- [Previous Topic] [Next Topic]
#4132 [2004-04-08 20:18:36]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by mahamayuri

The one who brought peace to Japan and unified it
was not Nobunaga Child-Eater Terrorist!

Was Ieyassu Tokugawa.

Ask the remainds of the IIGA clan who killed this assassin, what they think
about him as a "unifier"...

Anyone who do a massacre and genocide against weaponless civilians should
not desserve to be respected.

Octavio Augusto Okimoto Alves de Carvalho
São Paulo - SP Brazil



Message: 5
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 20:32:09 -0000
From: "Kitsuno" <samurai-listowner@...>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 768

Well, since a concequence of his actions led to more and more
territory falling under his control, I think by default Nobunaga is
a 'unifier'...


--- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, Meðal Mikit Stór-ljon
Oddhinsson wrote:
> I tend to agree that Nobunaga was not a Shogun. Not a dictator,
much less a
> unifier. Perhaps the better description to him would be
>
> Terrorist!
>
> Octavio Augusto Okimoto Alves de Carvalho
> São Paulo - SP Brazil
>
> PS: Parents in Japan, still nowaddays, mention Nobunaga to ill-
behaved
> children in scaring stories, just like we do with our children
using some
> folklore mythic monster.
>
>
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:26:01 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: Michael Lorimer
> > Subject: Re: oda nobunaga
> >
> > I tend to agree, Nobunaga was neither the unifier, or the first
> 'dictator', he wasn't even shogun. In terms of the question
itself, surely
> a leader (anywhere) could be both dictator and unifier, they are not
> mutually exclusive terms.
> > Sprouting from the term 'unifier' though I have a question? When
was Japan
> unified? Considering, Hokkaiko was really only geographically part
of Japan
> until the 18th and 19th Centuries, despite incursions and
expeditions into
> the north dating back to the Asuka-jidai, and before; while the
Nansei (SW)
> Islands (Okinawa, etc) were not part of Japan until the first
decades of the
> Edo-jidai.
> >
> > M.Lorimer
> >
> > "Anthony J. Bryant" wrote:
> > kentguy212002 wrote:
> >
> > > oda nobunaga unifier of japan or first dictator of japan? steve
> > > turnbulls book seem to be divided on this anyone got a view
> >
> > Frankly, he was neither. He wasn't a total unifier, and he was
hardly the
> first
> > "dictator" -- whatever that may mean in feudal Japanese terms.
> >
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >
> >



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 6
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 18:27:19 -0300
From: "Thiago Buschinelli Sorrentino" <tsorrentino@...>
Subject: RES: Digest Number 768


Anyways, would Hideiyoshi and Tokugawa have gotten that far without
Nobunaga´s incursions? Specially Tokuwaga, who seemed to be at the right
time, at the right place? Whilst I do not intend to set myself as an expert
on the field (an enthusiast, rather - please bear this in mind), would it be
too far from feasible bounds to hold that Tokugawa won by default (lack of
capable opponents)?

Thiago
-----

> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:26:01 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Michael Lorimer <mijalo_jp@...>
> Subject: Re: oda nobunaga
>
> I tend to agree, Nobunaga was neither the unifier, or the first
'dictator', he wasn't even shogun. In terms of the question itself,
surely
a leader (anywhere) could be both dictator and unifier, they are not
mutually exclusive terms.
> Sprouting from the term 'unifier' though I have a question? When was
Japan
unified? Considering, Hokkaiko was really only geographically part of
Japan
until the 18th and 19th Centuries, despite incursions and expeditions into
the north dating back to the Asuka-jidai, and before; while the Nansei
(SW)
Islands (Okinawa, etc) were not part of Japan until the first decades of
the
Edo-jidai.
>
> M.Lorimer
>
> "Anthony J. Bryant" <ajbryant@...> wrote:
> kentguy212002 wrote:
>
> > oda nobunaga unifier of japan or first dictator of japan? steve
> > turnbulls book seem to be divided on this anyone got a view
>
> Frankly, he was neither. He wasn't a total unifier, and he was hardly
the
first
> "dictator" -- whatever that may mean in feudal Japanese terms.
>
>
> Tony
>
>
>




---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 7
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 17:38:57 -0400
From: Oyakata <oyakata@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Digest Number 768

Kitsuno、オ、�、ホ<c4prc9+39l6@...>、ォ、�
>Well, since a concequence of his actions led to more and more
>territory falling under his control, I think by default Nobunaga is
>a 'unifier'...
>
It's probably right to say that he was "a" unifyer, since he took seve
ral regions that had been under the control of various people and
unified them under his control.

But sometimes Nobunaga is referred to as "the" unifier implying that
he succeeded in pulling all of Japan under his rule. Clearly that
was not the case.

So he's "a" unifier in terms of what he accomplished, but he is not
"the" unifier of Sengoku Japan.

Does that make sense?

--
Jay Kelly
oyakata@...


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 8
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 01:55:30 +0100 (BST)
From: Michael Lorimer <mijalo_jp@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Digest Number 768

I believe Oda Nobunaga was a great, if (personally) not likeable person. He
set himself (through ambition or just sheer consequence), and eventually
Japan upon the route to unification. His control was far more effectual than
that imposed four centuries earlier by either Taira no Kiyomori or Minamoto
no Yoritomo, but like these earlier examples, his control was only over the
central island of Honshu, not Kyushu, Shikoku, Chugoku (although that was
under way at the time of his death), Tohoku or Hokkaido. Although more
significant than Toyotomi Hideyoshi in what he established, it is Hideyoshi
who brought the bulk of the archipelago under a central administration and
was e facto unifier, although it was Nobunaga or set the work in motion and
undertook much of the hard labour (smashing the Ikko ikki, the Enryakuji,
the Imagawa, the Takeda, &c) that made the work of Toyotomi and the Tokugawa
considerably easier.
M.Lorimer

Oyakata <oyakata@...> wrote:
Kitsuno、オ、�、ホ<c4prc9+39l6@...>、ォ、�
>Well, since a concequence of his actions led to more and more
>territory falling under his control, I think by default Nobunaga is
>a 'unifier'...
>
It's probably right to say that he was "a" unifyer, since he took seve
ral regions that had been under the control of various people and
unified them under his control.

But sometimes Nobunaga is referred to as "the" unifier implying that
he succeeded in pulling all of Japan under his rule. Clearly that
was not the case.

So he's "a" unifier in terms of what he accomplished, but he is not
"the" unifier of Sengoku Japan.

Does that make sense?

--
Jay Kelly
oyakata@...


---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
WIN FREE WORLDWIDE FLIGHTS - nominate a cafe in the Yahoo! Mail Internet
Cafe Awards

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 9
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 20:51:20 -0500
From: "Anthony J. Bryant" <ajbryant@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Digest Number 768

Michael Lorimer wrote:
> I believe Oda Nobunaga was a great, if (personally) not likeable person.

I assume you mean "great, if unlikeable" -- "great, if not likeable" means a
*very* different thing.



Tony



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 10
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 03:35:59 +0100 (BST)
From: Michael Lorimer <mijalo_jp@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Digest Number 768

Bryant-sensei
I just hope that my occasionally sloppy grammar is all that you are opposed
to, not the comments themselves. Fuchyuui de honto ni moushiwake arimasen.
M.Lorimer

"Anthony J. Bryant" <ajbryant@...> wrote:
Michael Lorimer wrote:
> I believe Oda Nobunaga was a great, if (personally) not likeable person.

I assume you mean "great, if unlikeable" -- "great, if not likeable" means a
*very* different thing.



Tony



---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
WIN FREE WORLDWIDE FLIGHTS - nominate a cafe in the Yahoo! Mail Internet
Cafe Awards

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 11
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 22:16:28 -0500
From: "Anthony J. Bryant" <ajbryant@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Digest Number 768

Michael Lorimer wrote:

> Bryant-sensei I just hope that my occasionally sloppy grammar is all that
you
> are opposed to, not the comments themselves. Fuchyuui de honto ni
moushiwake
> arimasen. M.Lorimer

Definitely.

I just thought it was an amusingly fortuitous oops, given Nobunaga's rep.


Tony





________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 12
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:35:45 +0900
From: "William&Mikiko Letham" <mickey.letham@...>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 768

< children in scaring stories, just like we do with our children using some
folklore mythic monster.>>

Eleven years living in Japan and I have never heard of this happening. Most
parents never scare their children into good behavior. The few who do will
often use "tanuki" or something like that to warn their kids.






________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 13
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 04:47:30 +0100 (BST)
From: Michael Lorimer <mijalo_jp@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Digest Number 768

Quite, it was just too early in the a.m to have the 'English-head' on.
M.Lorimer

"Anthony J. Bryant" <ajbryant@...> wrote:
Michael Lorimer wrote:

> Bryant-sensei I just hope that my occasionally sloppy grammar is all that
you
> are opposed to, not the comments themselves. Fuchyuui de honto ni
moushiwake
> arimasen. M.Lorimer

Definitely.

I just thought it was an amusingly fortuitous oops, given Nobunaga's rep.


Tony





---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
WIN FREE WORLDWIDE FLIGHTS - nominate a cafe in the Yahoo! Mail Internet
Cafe Awards

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________


---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links




------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Next #4140]

#4140 [2004-04-06 21:44:41]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by ltdomer98

Somebody's been watching too much CNN...

Name someone who did NOT kill women and children in
16th century Japan. Ieyasu surely did.

As was stated before, the story about Japanese mothers
using Nobunaga to scare their kids into obeying is
plain silliness--William's never heard of it, I've
never heard of it, I doubt Kitsuno, Tony, et al have
heard of it. I doubt Kitsuno's Japanese wife,
William's Japanese wife, their Japanese families,
etc., have heard of it. My Japanese friends haven't
heard of it, either.

Yesterday I picked up several manga with Nobunaga as
the HERO. Characterizing him as a terrorist is naive.
The Japanese surely don't see him that way. Harsh
sometimes, yes. So was Alexander the Great. So was
Suleiman. So was Ghengis Khan. That hardly makes any
of them, including Nobunaga, evil. We went over this
before when someone compared him to Hitler--which is
absolutely RIDICULOUS.

Yeah, Nobunaga killed Buddhist priests--the same ones
that defied his rule, harbored his enemies, attacked
his supply lines, and openly declared themselves his
enemies. He destroyed MT Hiei to eliminate it as a
THREAT, not because he was satan incarnate. Oh my
gosh, he had women and children killed! So did
everyone else at the time--nobody then operated under
the Geneva or Hague conventions.

Nobunaga didn't enact a "final solution" against the
Iga ninja, aimed at systematically eliminating them as
a people by destroying anyone born in Iga. They defied
his control, so he acted to control them. Reality of
16th century Japan.

Quit thinking in terms of modern media. You can't
apply modern battlefield ethics to 1945 (could you
IMAGINE the outcry that wholesale firebombing of
cities would creat today??), much less 1575.

Nate

--- Me�al_Mikit_St�r-ljon_Oddhinsson
<medhal8@...> wrote:
> The one who brought peace to Japan and unified it
> was not Nobunaga Child-Eater Terrorist!
>
> Was Ieyassu Tokugawa.
>
> Ask the remainds of the IIGA clan who killed this
> assassin, what they think
> about him as a "unifier"...
>
> Anyone who do a massacre and genocide against
> weaponless civilians should
> not desserve to be respected.
>
> Octavio Augusto Okimoto Alves de Carvalho
> S�o Paulo - SP Brazil

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/

[Previous #4132] [Next #4142]

#4142 [2004-04-06 23:13:09]

RE: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by trepie2000

i think he's getting his info from sources outside of Japan because I too
have read of children being scared by threats but I read it was Korean
children scared by stories of tokugawa - same as many middle eastern
countries still scare their kids with stories of the demon invader
(ALexander the great to westerners)

as for the killings he did - well they were par for the course in those days
you would be hard pressed to find any leaders around the world who didnt do
these things without meaning it to be seen as horrific because they believed
differently from the way people do now.

i believe he was just a man of his time who managed to rise above his lowly
start in the same way as Genghis Khan and is just seen through the eyes of a
modern man as a murderer, even though he wasnt at the time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nate Ledbetter [mailto:ltdomer98@...]
Sent: 07 April 2004 05:45
To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784


Somebody's been watching too much CNN...

Name someone who did NOT kill women and children in
16th century Japan. Ieyasu surely did.

As was stated before, the story about Japanese mothers
using Nobunaga to scare their kids into obeying is
plain silliness--William's never heard of it, I've
never heard of it, I doubt Kitsuno, Tony, et al have
heard of it. I doubt Kitsuno's Japanese wife,
William's Japanese wife, their Japanese families,
etc., have heard of it. My Japanese friends haven't
heard of it, either.

Yesterday I picked up several manga with Nobunaga as
the HERO. Characterizing him as a terrorist is naive.
The Japanese surely don't see him that way. Harsh
sometimes, yes. So was Alexander the Great. So was
Suleiman. So was Ghengis Khan. That hardly makes any
of them, including Nobunaga, evil. We went over this
before when someone compared him to Hitler--which is
absolutely RIDICULOUS.

Yeah, Nobunaga killed Buddhist priests--the same ones
that defied his rule, harbored his enemies, attacked
his supply lines, and openly declared themselves his
enemies. He destroyed MT Hiei to eliminate it as a
THREAT, not because he was satan incarnate. Oh my
gosh, he had women and children killed! So did
everyone else at the time--nobody then operated under
the Geneva or Hague conventions.

Nobunaga didn't enact a "final solution" against the
Iga ninja, aimed at systematically eliminating them as
a people by destroying anyone born in Iga. They defied
his control, so he acted to control them. Reality of
16th century Japan.

Quit thinking in terms of modern media. You can't
apply modern battlefield ethics to 1945 (could you
IMAGINE the outcry that wholesale firebombing of
cities would creat today??), much less 1575.

Nate

--- Mepal_Mikit_Stsr-ljon_Oddhinsson
<medhal8@...> wrote:
> The one who brought peace to Japan and unified it
> was not Nobunaga Child-Eater Terrorist!
>
> Was Ieyassu Tokugawa.
>
> Ask the remainds of the IIGA clan who killed this
> assassin, what they think
> about him as a "unifier"...
>
> Anyone who do a massacre and genocide against
> weaponless civilians should
> not desserve to be respected.
>
> Octavio Augusto Okimoto Alves de Carvalho
> Sco Paulo - SP Brazil

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/



---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Previous #4140] [Next #4143]

#4143 [2004-04-07 00:56:09]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by cepooooo

On Apr 6, 2004, at 6:44 PM, Nate Ledbetter wrote:

> Somebody's been watching too much CNN...
>
> Name someone who did NOT kill women and children in
> 16th century Japan. Ieyasu surely did.
>
> As was stated before, the story about Japanese mothers
> using Nobunaga to scare their kids into obeying is
> plain silliness--William's never heard of it, I've
> never heard of it, I doubt Kitsuno, Tony, et al have
> heard of it. I doubt Kitsuno's Japanese wife,
> William's Japanese wife, their Japanese families,
> etc., have heard of it. My Japanese friends haven't
> heard of it, either.

It's the legend of a legend.
Everybody hears moms told their kids about Nobunaga, but no kid have
ever heard from his/her mom...
cepo

[Previous #4142] [Next #4146]

#4146 [2004-04-07 04:35:02]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by jckelly108

On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 07:13:09 +0100, Tristan Burkeさん wrote in message <JAEALPEFBIFABLHFNDJLIENOCKAA.football1st@...>
>i think he's getting his info from sources outside of Japan because I too
>have read of children being scared by threats but I read it was Korean
>children scared by stories of tokugawa - same as many middle eastern
>countries still scare their kids with stories of the demon invader
>(ALexander the great to westerners)

Just for the record let me add that I too have never heard of
Japanese mothers using Nobunaga as a bogeyman, to scare their kids
into good behavior.

>as for the killings he did - well they were par for the course in those days
>you would be hard pressed to find any leaders around the world who didnt do
>these things without meaning it to be seen as horrific because they believed
>differently from the way people do now.

This I think is overstating it a bit in the opposite direction. Seeing
Nobunaga as a "demon" and all of that is definitely a modern, and it
seems to me western, way to interpret what he accomplished. But even
contemporary and Japanese sources do agree that Nobunaga was
something fierce. The Hiei-zan incident in particular is pointed to
as being well over the top, but there are several others.

So I think it is fair to say that Nobunaga's methods were indeed
fearsome and from time to time were quite out of the norm even
within the context of the time period in Japan.

My own interpretation of it is that Nobunaga really did go further
than most people of the time. One the one hand, this could be seen
as "terrorism" or something similar by those people who can read
history only in the context of their own personal, modern
experiences. On the other hand, this willingness to do these kind
of deeds probably is a symptom of whatever it was that Nobunaga "had"
that allowed him to play the historical role that he did.

>i believe he was just a man of his time who managed to rise above his lowly
>start in the same way as Genghis Khan and is just seen through the eyes of a
>modern man as a murderer, even though he wasnt at the time.

--
Jay Kelly
oyakata@...

[Previous #4143] [Next #4155]

#4155 [2004-04-07 12:25:16]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by holydemon13

Another thing about Nobunaga...
I agree with those of you who have said he's not a terrorist. From
what I've seen and heard, a terrorist usually works outside the law, working to
break it and create chaos. Oda Nobunaga did no such thing. He had the
sanction of Ogimachi, I believe, from about 1562. He deposed the last Ashikaga
shogun, and was the first of what I've seen called the "three unifiers." As for
working outside the law, he essentially WAS the law, as seen, and noted by
others in the group, through his repression of real or perceived threats and the
aforementioned deposition of Ashikaga Yoshiaki. There was no bigger bully on
the Sengoku block than Nobunaga, from Okehazama to Honnoji. Shingen and
Kenshin it seems were little more than a sidenote (even if the largest of them) to
the Oda drive and wasn't one in some sort of alliance or another with the Oda
anyway?

L8r
Tim


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Previous #4146] [Next #4157]

#4157 [2004-04-07 16:08:00]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by ltdomer98

--- Cesare Polenghi <cepo@...> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2004, at 6:44 PM, Nate Ledbetter wrote:
>
>
> It's the legend of a legend.
> Everybody hears moms told their kids about Nobunaga,
> but no kid have
> ever heard from his/her mom...
> cepo
>

Somebody one time did this, some gaijin found out
about it, and now it's "all Japanese do this"...kind
of like all Japanese study karate and lounge about the
house in yukata...

Nate

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/

[Previous #4155] [Next #4164]

#4164 [2004-04-07 21:21:50]

RE: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by trepie2000

u mean they don't???? damn tv has been lying to me????? my world has just
been shattered!! :o)
-----Original Message-----
From: Nate Ledbetter [mailto:ltdomer98@...]
Sent: 08 April 2004 00:08
To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784



--- Cesare Polenghi <cepo@...> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2004, at 6:44 PM, Nate Ledbetter wrote:
>
>
> It's the legend of a legend.
> Everybody hears moms told their kids about Nobunaga,
> but no kid have
> ever heard from his/her mom...
> cepo
>

Somebody one time did this, some gaijin found out
about it, and now it's "all Japanese do this"...kind
of like all Japanese study karate and lounge about the
house in yukata...

Nate

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/


---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Previous #4157] [Next #4165]

#4165 [2004-04-07 20:58:10]

RE: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by trepie2000

Jay,

I agree with what your saying - having reread what i put i didn't explain
myself properly -

I was trying to say that, like Genghis Khan, he went that bit further than
his contemporaries because his lowly start to life meant he had to be that
little bit stronger to be accepted as a leader. Without going that extra
little bit he could never have hoped to maintain any level of control over
his fellow Samurai - instead their disdain for his lower status would have
lead to trouble - it was fear he used rather than terror as he targeted
those he felt opposed him rather than just indiscrimate killings which would
have made him a terrorist, instead he was no different to a hundred other
rulers - and certainly not as bad as some.
-----Original Message-----
From: Oyakata [mailto:oyakata@...]
Sent: 07 April 2004 12:35
To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784


On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 07:13:09 +0100, Tristan Burkeさん wrote in message
<JAEALPEFBIFABLHFNDJLIENOCKAA.football1st@...>
>i think he's getting his info from sources outside of Japan because I too
>have read of children being scared by threats but I read it was Korean
>children scared by stories of tokugawa - same as many middle eastern
>countries still scare their kids with stories of the demon invader
>(ALexander the great to westerners)

Just for the record let me add that I too have never heard of
Japanese mothers using Nobunaga as a bogeyman, to scare their kids
into good behavior.

>as for the killings he did - well they were par for the course in those
days
>you would be hard pressed to find any leaders around the world who didnt
do
>these things without meaning it to be seen as horrific because they
believed
>differently from the way people do now.

This I think is overstating it a bit in the opposite direction. Seeing
Nobunaga as a "demon" and all of that is definitely a modern, and it
seems to me western, way to interpret what he accomplished. But even
contemporary and Japanese sources do agree that Nobunaga was
something fierce. The Hiei-zan incident in particular is pointed to
as being well over the top, but there are several others.

So I think it is fair to say that Nobunaga's methods were indeed
fearsome and from time to time were quite out of the norm even
within the context of the time period in Japan.

My own interpretation of it is that Nobunaga really did go further
than most people of the time. One the one hand, this could be seen
as "terrorism" or something similar by those people who can read
history only in the context of their own personal, modern
experiences. On the other hand, this willingness to do these kind
of deeds probably is a symptom of whatever it was that Nobunaga "had"
that allowed him to play the historical role that he did.

>i believe he was just a man of his time who managed to rise above his
lowly
>start in the same way as Genghis Khan and is just seen through the eyes
of a
>modern man as a murderer, even though he wasnt at the time.

--
Jay Kelly
oyakata@...


---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Previous #4164] [Next #4173]

#4173 [2004-04-08 03:18:25]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by edyhiphop

Well,Shingen nor Kenshin were allied with Oda.Shingen fought with Oda all his life(apart from fighting with Kenshin and others).Takeda Katsuyori continued the battle with Oda but finally Katsuyori was defeated at Nagashino.Kenshin fought also with Oda but I don't know if he won or not.

Edy


----- Original Message -----
From: Eponymous13@...
To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784


Another thing about Nobunaga...
I agree with those of you who have said he's not a terrorist. From
what I've seen and heard, a terrorist usually works outside the law, working to
break it and create chaos. Oda Nobunaga did no such thing. He had the
sanction of Ogimachi, I believe, from about 1562. He deposed the last Ashikaga
shogun, and was the first of what I've seen called the "three unifiers." As for
working outside the law, he essentially WAS the law, as seen, and noted by
others in the group, through his repression of real or perceived threats and the
aforementioned deposition of Ashikaga Yoshiaki. There was no bigger bully on
the Sengoku block than Nobunaga, from Okehazama to Honnoji. Shingen and
Kenshin it seems were little more than a sidenote (even if the largest of them) to
the Oda drive and wasn't one in some sort of alliance or another with the Oda
anyway?

L8r
Tim


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Previous #4165] [Next #4174]

#4174 [2004-04-09 05:40:40]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by holydemon13

Cool. Thanx, edy. :-)

L8r
T


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Previous #4173] [Next #4177]

#4177 [2004-04-09 06:25:51]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by jckelly108

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 13:18:25 +0300, Edward Alexanderさん wrote in message <004c01c41d52$d3e60f10$4664a8c0@P428>
>Well,Shingen nor Kenshin were allied with Oda.Shingen fought with Oda all his
>life(apart from fighting with Kenshin and others).

Nobunaga and Kenshin were allies against Takeda Shingen for about 1
year.

>Takeda Katsuyori continued >the battle with Oda but finally Katsuyori
>was defeated at Nagashino.Kenshin >fought also with Oda but I don't
>know if he won or not.

Kenshin - rather famously - died in between battles. He personally did
not lose nor win the long-standing campaign against Nobunaga. But his
sons could not match him and the Uesugi family became a non-factor
rather quickly.


Our kind host has a very nice summary of this at
http://www.samurai-archives.com/kenshin.html

--
Jay Kelly
oyakata@...

[Previous #4174] [Next #4178]

#4178 [2004-04-09 06:46:48]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by edyhiphop

Thanx,useful.Never new that part with Kenshin and Oda(that they were allies).

Edy
From: Oyakata
To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784


On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 13:18:25 +0300, Edward Alexanderさん wrote in message <004c01c41d52$d3e60f10$4664a8c0@P428>
>Well,Shingen nor Kenshin were allied with Oda.Shingen fought with Oda all his
>life(apart from fighting with Kenshin and others).

Nobunaga and Kenshin were allies against Takeda Shingen for about 1
year.

>Takeda Katsuyori continued >the battle with Oda but finally Katsuyori
>was defeated at Nagashino.Kenshin >fought also with Oda but I don't
>know if he won or not.

Kenshin - rather famously - died in between battles. He personally did
not lose nor win the long-standing campaign against Nobunaga. But his
sons could not match him and the Uesugi family became a non-factor
rather quickly.


Our kind host has a very nice summary of this at
http://www.samurai-archives.com/kenshin.html

--
Jay Kelly
oyakata@...


---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Previous #4177] [Next #4180]

#4180 [2004-04-09 04:37:13]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by mijalo_jp

I think if memory serves me right that Takeda Shingen and Oda Nobunaga were in fact in an alliance of sorts. After moving his capital to the captured castle of Inabayama (renamed Gifu), Nobunaga allied himself in 1568 with Matsudaira Motoyasu and Takeda Shingen (both ambitious daimyo to the north). The Takeda-Oda negotiations centred around the marriage of Shingen's son to Nobunaga's daughter. By 1571, Nobunaga was treating the puppet Yoshiaki with increasing heavy-handedness, and Yoshiaki was no doubt hoping that Shingen would come to his assistance. He didn't. As the Takeda and Tokugawa clashed in the early 1570s, it brought Nobunaga the problem of either standing aside of the issue or supporting one ally against another. When the Tokugawa requested support against Shingen, little was forthcoming from Nobunaga. This indicates Nobunaga's pragmatic diplomacy. Firstly, he avoided until the last moment choosing between two allies, and secondly, their regional campaigns allowed him to
consolidate his position in Kyoto and prevent Yoshiaki easily finding a new champion.
M.Lorimer

Edward Alexander <edy@...> wrote:
Well,Shingen nor Kenshin were allied with Oda.Shingen fought with Oda all his life(apart from fighting with Kenshin and others).Takeda Katsuyori continued the battle with Oda but finally Katsuyori was defeated at Nagashino.Kenshin fought also with Oda but I don't know if he won or not.

Edy


----- Original Message -----
From: Eponymous13@...
To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784


Another thing about Nobunaga...
I agree with those of you who have said he's not a terrorist. From
what I've seen and heard, a terrorist usually works outside the law, working to
break it and create chaos. Oda Nobunaga did no such thing. He had the
sanction of Ogimachi, I believe, from about 1562. He deposed the last Ashikaga
shogun, and was the first of what I've seen called the "three unifiers." As for
working outside the law, he essentially WAS the law, as seen, and noted by
others in the group, through his repression of real or perceived threats and the
aforementioned deposition of Ashikaga Yoshiaki. There was no bigger bully on
the Sengoku block than Nobunaga, from Okehazama to Honnoji. Shingen and
Kenshin it seems were little more than a sidenote (even if the largest of them) to
the Oda drive and wasn't one in some sort of alliance or another with the Oda
anyway?

L8r
Tim


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Previous #4178] [Next #4182]

#4182 [2004-04-09 08:01:12]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by edyhiphop

Correct!!!!!!!Shingen had lady Oda as one of his wives.He had about 4 wives.Lady Oda,lady Hojo,lady Suwa and Lady Sanjo.I think.

Edy


----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Lorimer
To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784


I think if memory serves me right that Takeda Shingen and Oda Nobunaga were in fact in an alliance of sorts. After moving his capital to the captured castle of Inabayama (renamed Gifu), Nobunaga allied himself in 1568 with Matsudaira Motoyasu and Takeda Shingen (both ambitious daimyo to the north). The Takeda-Oda negotiations centred around the marriage of Shingen's son to Nobunaga's daughter. By 1571, Nobunaga was treating the puppet Yoshiaki with increasing heavy-handedness, and Yoshiaki was no doubt hoping that Shingen would come to his assistance. He didn't. As the Takeda and Tokugawa clashed in the early 1570s, it brought Nobunaga the problem of either standing aside of the issue or supporting one ally against another. When the Tokugawa requested support against Shingen, little was forthcoming from Nobunaga. This indicates Nobunaga's pragmatic diplomacy. Firstly, he avoided until the last moment choosing between two allies, and secondly, their regional campaigns allowed him to
consolidate his position in Kyoto and prevent Yoshiaki easily finding a new champion.
M.Lorimer

Edward Alexander <edy@...> wrote:
Well,Shingen nor Kenshin were allied with Oda.Shingen fought with Oda all his life(apart from fighting with Kenshin and others).Takeda Katsuyori continued the battle with Oda but finally Katsuyori was defeated at Nagashino.Kenshin fought also with Oda but I don't know if he won or not.

Edy


----- Original Message -----
From: Eponymous13@...
To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784


Another thing about Nobunaga...
I agree with those of you who have said he's not a terrorist. From
what I've seen and heard, a terrorist usually works outside the law, working to
break it and create chaos. Oda Nobunaga did no such thing. He had the
sanction of Ogimachi, I believe, from about 1562. He deposed the last Ashikaga
shogun, and was the first of what I've seen called the "three unifiers." As for
working outside the law, he essentially WAS the law, as seen, and noted by
others in the group, through his repression of real or perceived threats and the
aforementioned deposition of Ashikaga Yoshiaki. There was no bigger bully on
the Sengoku block than Nobunaga, from Okehazama to Honnoji. Shingen and
Kenshin it seems were little more than a sidenote (even if the largest of them) to
the Oda drive and wasn't one in some sort of alliance or another with the Oda
anyway?

L8r
Tim


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Previous #4180] [Next #4188]

#4188 [2004-04-09 17:20:02]

Re: [samuraihistory] Digest Number 784

by jckelly108

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 04:58:10 +0100, Tristan Burkeさん wrote in message <JAEALPEFBIFABLHFNDJLAEOGCKAA.football1st@...>
>Jay,
>
>I agree with what your saying - having reread what i put i didn't explain
>myself properly -
>

Tristan,
Thanks for the clarification. I can see what you mean and I think we
are probably in violent agreement for the most part. :)

--
Jay Kelly
oyakata@...

[Previous #4182]


Made with