Dear Kitsuno,
Thank you again for your reply.
You are quite right. Samurai record-keeping appears to be quite
meticulous, and there appears to be a lot of information, albeit I
can't seem to find it in "summary" form, or in a fashion that
doesn't require a lot of filtering... and a lot of work...
I think my "turbulence" statement was a relative one.
Thanks,
Shaun
P.S. As recommended, I purchased the books by G.B. Sansom. I'm
also considering purchasing the History of Japan volumes by James
Murdoch. Have you read these? Are they any good?
--- In
samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, "Kitsuno"
listowner@...> wrote:
>
> --- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, "shaundlcurry"
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Kitsuno,
> >
> > Thank you for your reply. I can't believe how phenomenally
> > difficult it is to piece together all this information...
Clearly,
> > record-keeping was not a priority for Samurai or Peasants during
the
> > turbulent 1620's...
> >
> > Can you recommend any well-organized books, periodicals, and/or
> > websites that provides comprehensive lists of Daimyos per
regions?
> > i.e. I am looking for a list Daimyos on Kyushu only.
>
> Record-keeping has always been an obsession throughout Japanese
> history. Every clan has detailed genealogies and detailed clan
> histories. If you can't read Japanese, you are more limited, but
I'd
> just be creative - I would first find a map something like this
one:
> http://www.samurai-archives.com/maphome.html
> Then I would write down the names of all of the daimyo I see on
> Kyushu, and then I would get various library books that deal with
> Japanese history, flip to the index, and try to find out who was in
> charge of the clan during the 1620s - off the top of my head,
George
> Sansom's 2nd and/or 3rd book (History of Japan) would be one place
to
> look. It's pretty basic research. If you read Japanese, the
Japanese
> wikipedia and harimaya.com has detailed family trees for almost
every
> major clan, and the Sengoku Jinmei Jiten edited by Abe would be
> another resource. I'd help out, but I don't have the time. Maybe
> someone else around here?
>
> Also, I'm curious - what "turbulence" are you talking about during
the
> 1620s? I can't think of much of anything overly turbulent
happening in
> the 1620s aside from the non-event of Iemitsu becoming shogun, and
the
> start of Sakoku.
>