>From: "fycorecords" <fycorecords@...>_________________________________________________________________
>Reply-To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
>To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [samuraihistory] Re: Samurai photos
>Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 08:00:09 -0000
>
>
>thank you for your reply but...
>
>who say s i was not a black belt!
>i have been practicing martial arts since i was 12 years old!
>i m 38 ;)
>
>
>T
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---
>Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
>Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
>---
>
>Join the 2007 Samurai Fiction Contest:
>http://www.samurai-archives.com/writcon2.html
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>honor.
>
>
>
> Let's put things a different way. Your devotion to budo does you
> Those whom you respect would however be horrified at you showing your"showing"
> respect by getting a tattoo. If you have students consider them
> their respect for you by torturing small animals. Something they may bereaction
> "into" that you most definately wouldn't support. What would *your*
> be?Lacking the little emoticon image of the guy with raised eyebrows
>
> --- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Peters"___________________________________________________________
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Let's put things a different way. Your devotion to budo does you
>>
> honor.
>
>> Those whom you respect would however be horrified at you showing your
>> respect by getting a tattoo. If you have students consider them
>>
> "showing"
>
>> their respect for you by torturing small animals. Something they may be
>> "into" that you most definately wouldn't support. What would *your*
>>
> reaction
>
>> be?
>>
>>
>
> Lacking the little emoticon image of the guy with raised eyebrows
> holding up the WFT? sign, I'll just come right out and say "WTF?".
> Call me crazy, but not only do I not see a correlation between getting
> a tattoo and torturing small animals, but I also have to play the
> devil's advocate and ask why you would assume that "people [he]
> respects" would be horrified at a tattoo? To further play Satan's
> Lawyer, are you saying that "respectable" people don't get tattoos?
> You've dug yourself a bit of a hole, can you get out? ;)
>Kitsuno,
>Lacking the little emoticon image of the guy with raised eyebrows
>holding up the WFT? sign, I'll just come right out and say "WTF?".
>Call me crazy, but not only do I not see a correlation between getting
>a tattoo and torturing small animals, but I also have to play the
>devil's advocate and ask why you would assume that "people [he]
>respects" would be horrified at a tattoo?
>Lawyer, are you saying that "respectable" people don't get tattoos?Whether *I* feel respectable people don't get tattoos isn't the issue. The
>You've dug yourself a bit of a hole, can you get out? ;)
>The eta/burakumin didn't necessarily have tattoos - the tattoos were
> The only thing *I* could think about when hearing of tattoos and
> disrespect is that in ancient Japan only 'eta' ('outcasts' as I
> understood) had tattoos... right?
> Anyway, I can't help you either, T.
>
>japanese
>
> >
> >Lacking the little emoticon image of the guy with raised eyebrows
> >holding up the WFT? sign, I'll just come right out and say "WTF?".
> >Call me crazy, but not only do I not see a correlation between getting
> >a tattoo and torturing small animals, but I also have to play the
> >devil's advocate and ask why you would assume that "people [he]
> >respects" would be horrified at a tattoo?
>
>
> Kitsuno,
>
> Cite instances of Samurai (not Yakuza who Claim to be following the
> samurai tradition) wearing tattoos. Do you claim that during say, the
> momoyama period, tattoos were socially acceptable by the bushi? The
> perception of tattoos as unclean is a modern only sensibility? Theanalogy
> works unless of course he *is* into torturing small animals. Mypoint was
> simply something perfectly acceptable to someone in one time andculture
> (tattoos, now, in the West) could be taken as bizarre at the least bysomething, then,
> someone from another time and culture (tattoos in honor of
> Japan).issue. The
>
>
> To further play Satan's
> >Lawyer, are you saying that "respectable" people don't get tattoos?
> >You've dug yourself a bit of a hole, can you get out? ;)
>
> Whether *I* feel respectable people don't get tattoos isn't the
> issue is how tattoos are percieved in Japan. Note *I* have a tat andeven
> though most rules Japanese apply to themselves are ignored as bakagaijin
> things when foreigners are concerned, there aren't many onsen I canvisit
> due to 1 small tat. Can you cite any "respectable" japanese who havetats
> (entertainers excluded of course)? Note: respectable as it would beapplied
> in Japan. I have some japanese friends who have tats and they are greatSince the original email was from (presumably) an american in america
> people, but none are politicians, CEOs etc.
>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kitsuno" <samurai-listowner@...>
To: <samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:46 PM
Subject: [samuraihistory] Re: Samurai photos
--- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Peters"
wrote:
>
>
> >
> >Lacking the little emoticon image of the guy with raised eyebrows
> >holding up the WFT? sign, I'll just come right out and say "WTF?".
> >Call me crazy, but not only do I not see a correlation between getting
> >a tattoo and torturing small animals, but I also have to play the
> >devil's advocate and ask why you would assume that "people [he]
> >respects" would be horrified at a tattoo?
>
>
> Kitsuno,
>
> Cite instances of Samurai (not Yakuza who Claim to be following the
> samurai tradition) wearing tattoos. Do you claim that during say, the
> momoyama period, tattoos were socially acceptable by the bushi? The
japanese
> perception of tattoos as unclean is a modern only sensibility? The
analogy
> works unless of course he *is* into torturing small animals. My
point was
> simply something perfectly acceptable to someone in one time and
culture
> (tattoos, now, in the West) could be taken as bizarre at the least by
> someone from another time and culture (tattoos in honor of
something, then,
> Japan).
> Since the original email was from (presumably) an american in americaREPLY
> who wanted to get body art that reflected his interest in martial arts
> and the Samurai as a personal (maybe even relatively private depending
> on the location) symbol of his own interests, I didn't even consider
> or see any relationship to Japan or the Samurai, which is why I had
> trouble making sense out of what you meant. I would agree with you if
> he was in/going to Japan and/or wanted to show off his tattoos to
> Japanese people to show how much of a Samurai he is, but I didn't
> really get that impression. It seemed pretty innocent, actually. So
> since it seemed to me that it was an innocent request by an american
> in america, it was easy for me to take your statement as a statement
> of your personal feelings for tattoos. And I've seen plenty of people
> in Japan with tattoos, it isn't as bad as it used to be. I even knew
> a Japanese highschool teacher with tattoos around his collarbone,
> where he could hide it. Schoolteachers are "supposed" to be
> respectable. Anyway, you really can't make a blanket statement that
> "NO 'respectable' Japanese person would get a tattoo", because it
> would only take one person to get one to make your entire statement
> false. I just percieved a subjective argument and played devil's
> advocate and tried to poke holes in it. That's all.
>