Sharon-
Your sword is likely of Chinese or South-Asian manufacture as has been
said. The inlay suggest south Asia as this was popular there. The inclusion
of a date is also very interesting though all the kanji cannot be made out
from the photo.
Not that I am an expert but what this looks like is what is known as an
occupied territory sword. Swords made in the areas occupied by the Japanese
before and during the Pacific War made by local craftsmen with local
materials after the Japanese fashion. The very same techniques used then
are being applied now to make the knock-offs we so often from Chinese
sellers. This looks like it may in fact be older (40 or 50 years) but
someone has clearly gussied up the scabbard and etched the blade (hence the
very visible striations). The tsuba looks like a charcoal brick because it
has been burnt, likely in an attempt to age it artificially. Also the sharp
angle of the kissaki is a bad sign, not likely the blade was originally
Japanese but if it were the value is lost because the tip would have to be
drastically reshaped to save it.
Key questions are; what does the tang of the blade look like and what are
the kanji given in the date? Clearly this is not treasure to sword
collectors but may be an interesting bit of history and not just pure and
simple fakery.
Your friend can learn much more by following the links found here;
http://home.earthlink.net/~steinrl/nihonto.htm
We recommend anyone with an interest in swords join us at
nihonto@yahoogroups.com and to seek out fellow enthusiasts at their local
sword club,
Tom Helm
ncjsc.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .