Great points. I'm not a history expert. But from what I've read and seen, it
seems that the Tokugawa shogunate was one of the most effective
authoritarian governments that ever existed. It survived for 250+ years. One
of the ways it survived was in "taming" the samurai class, once there were
no longer any wars. The daimyo were "tamed" by the system of every other
year having to live in Edo and his wife and children basically being kept
hostage there. The "common" ordinary retainers were "tamed" by instituting
codes of conduct that emphasized an interpretation of Confucian thought
where serving the bakufu was what a "superior man" must do. The bakufu
appears to have discouraged self-reliance and even discouraged service to
one's daimyo unless it also meant service to the bakufu. As you said,
sayings such as "the sword is the soul of the samurai" were used to shift
the emphasis away from the samurai as an individual toward having the
samurai subsume his individuality to serve the best interests of the
Tokugawa state.
The huge "sword of Damocles" that the Tokugawa shogunate held over the
daimyo and their retainers was the threat of clan abolishment, where the
fate of the clansmen was either seppuku (mostly for the daimyo and higher
officials) or for retainers, being thrust into the essentially non-person
status of ronin.
Nina
-----Original Message-----
From:
samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Thomas Davidson
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 1:00 PM
To:
samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [samuraihistory] The 'Image' of the Samurai
[snips]
I wonder, however - if Ieyasu could have done away with the sammurai after
the bakafu was safely established - would he have done so?
To me 'the sword is the soul of the samurai' shifts the emphasis away from
the man, and is all part of the 'cult of the Tokugawa' in that the man now
has something to live up to outside of himself - and the person he should
aspire to be was founded on Confucian ethic of service to the state. -
precisely because the Tokugawa did not want a military class with such a
strong sense of self-determination and self-reliance.
Thus the occasions when samurai were brought before the court for acting
'properly' - the instant redress of perceived offence - always put the
bakafu in a difficult position - they wanted a samurai bound by his code of
honour, but they were stuck then when he acted without asking their
permission first.
Just a personal view, but it seems to me the bakafu always 'fudged' the
issue when faced with the question of self-determination v subjugation to
the state.
Just some thoughts...
Thomas
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get
fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/BcOolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
---
Join the 2006 Samurai Fiction contest:
http://www.samurai-archives.com/writcon2.html
Samurai Archives:
http://www.samurai-archives.com Samurai Archives store:
http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---
Yahoo! Groups Links