>http://www.geocities.com/klancesegall/home.htm
> Please, I'd like to know if it was forbidden for the
> samurai to use
> a gun by pride?
>
> Thank you.
>Thank you. ^_^
> --- La La Ruwrote:
>
> >
> > Please, I'd like to know if it was forbidden for the
> > samurai to use
> > a gun by pride?
> >
> > Thank you.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/klancesegall/home.htm
>
> The answer is a resounding "no". See further
> elaboration at the link above--it's misconception #1
>
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:31:45 -0000, La La Ru <lalaru55@...> wrote:
>
>
> Please, I'd like to know if it was forbidden for the samurai to use
> a gun by pride?
>
> Thank you.
>
> ---
> Join the 2005 'Samurai Fiction' contest:
> http://www.samurai-archives.com/writcon.html
> Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
> Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
> ---
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v494/LaLaRu/samurai_article.jpg
>
> (refference book; "What is It?" by Simon and
> Schuster Inc., New
> York. (c) 1984)
>
>
>Yes. It's incredibly simplistic, and a product of
> Is this article false?
> >
> >
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v494/LaLaRu/samurai_article.jpg
> >
> > Is this article false?
>
> Yes. It's incredibly simplistic, and a product of
> Western perception rather than actual research, it
> appears. It also looks like it's out of a children's
> book.
>
> Nate
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes, Nate. It's a children's "educational" book I recieved on myChildren's books are almost always simplified, sometimes to the point
> birthday, when I was a child. Simon and Schuster Inc. mostly make
> children's book. I'm quite shocked how inaccurate the information
> is. Thank you for clearing this up. I wish to learn, not stereotype.
> That's a good philosphy.
>was a
> And to more fully answer your original question: I'm sure there
> range of attitude towards guns among the samurai when they werefirst
> introduced, and there were probably a few grognards among them whothey
> though of guns as unworthy weapons for a true warrior. However,
> were probably a minority -- on the whole, samurai tended to bequite
> pragmatic.I wonder though if the "guns are dishounourable" attitude might not
>
> Phil
> I wonder though if the "guns are dishounourable" attitude mightnot
> have been perpetuated by those clans who were too poor to employsour grapes
> them in any large number. IIRC, the Hojo only had some 300 guns
> listed in their inventory in the mid-1580s.
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 05:22:02 -0000, La La Ru <lalaru55@...> wrote:
>
>
> Yes, Nate. It's a children's "educational" book I recieved on my
> birthday, when I was a child. Simon and Schuster Inc. mostly make
> children's book. I'm quite shocked how inaccurate the information
> is. Thank you for clearing this up. I wish to learn, not stereotype.
> That's a good philosphy.
>
> --- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, Nate Ledbetter
>wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v494/LaLaRu/samurai_article.jpg
> > >
> > > Is this article false?
> >
> > Yes. It's incredibly simplistic, and a product of
> > Western perception rather than actual research, it
> > appears. It also looks like it's out of a children's
> > book.
> >
> > Nate
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Join the 2005 'Samurai Fiction' contest:
> http://www.samurai-archives.com/writcon.html
> Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
> Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
> ---
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>Hmmm...I'm not sure Tony appreciates being called
> you like simple reading?! Try
> this:http://www.ospreypublishing.com/ ;
> good books. I strongly recommend not too
> complicated pictures and good texts...
>I'm used to being called "simple."
> --- tihi <tihanap@...> wrote:
>
>
>>you like simple reading?! Try
>>this:http://www.ospreypublishing.com/ ;
>> good books. I strongly recommend not too
>>complicated pictures and good texts...
>
>
> Hmmm...I'm not sure Tony appreciates being called
> "simple reading"...
>
> Nate Ledbetter wrote:
>
> >
> > --- tihi <tihanap@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>you like simple reading?! Try
> >>this:http://www.ospreypublishing.com/ ;
> >> good books. I strongly recommend not too
> >>complicated pictures and good texts...
> >
> >
> > Hmmm...I'm not sure Tony appreciates being called
> > "simple reading"...
>
> I'm used to being called "simple."
>
> Tony
> --
>
> Anthony J. Bryant
> Website: http://www.sengokudaimyo.com
>
> Effingham's Heraldic Avatars (...and stuff):
> http://www.sengokudaimyo.com/avatarbiz.html
>
> Grand Cross, Order of the Laurel:
> http://www.cafepress.com/laurelorder
>
>
> ---
> Join the 2005 'Samurai Fiction' contest:
> http://www.samurai-archives.com/writcon.html
> Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
> Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
> ---
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>No problem--it was meant as a joke. Tony's published a
> I didnt mean to dissrespect anbody. I assure you my
> intensions were
> good,also I am a great fan of Osprey publishing.
> No problem--it was meant as a joke. Tony's published a
> few books with Osprey, so I thought I'd take a jab at
> him. I've got to when I can.
> Nate Ledbetter wrote:Think about those files I sent you. That should
>
> > No problem--it was meant as a joke. Tony's
> published a
> > few books with Osprey, so I thought I'd take a jab
> at
> > him. I've got to when I can.
>
>No. Problem. It's. Your. Job.
>
>>No, just a different gritting. (Sharing too much?No. Problem. It's. Your. Job.
>>
>
>
> Think about those files I sent you. That should
> un-grit your teeth.