Home - Back

Samurai Colours

- [Previous Topic] [Next Topic]
#6501 [2005-01-11 03:58:30]

Samurai Colours

by russcat9

In the 16thC the Shimazu were known to equip their warriors with black
armour, much like the Ii and Sanada? with red.

When did this sort of thing start? Does anyone really know?

Is it conceivable that a Shimazu daimyo of the 14thC might have
equipped his men with black armour, if similar things were occurring
in the 16thC?

Paul

[Next #6502]

#6502 [2005-01-11 15:03:35]

Re: [samuraihistory] Samurai Colours

by ltdomer98

--- russcat9 <snowcat9@...> wrote:

> In the 16thC the Shimazu were known to equip their
> warriors with black
> armour, much like the Ii and Sanada? with red.

Not the Sanada, as far as I know. The Ii took the
idea, I believe, from the troops of Yamagata
Masakage--I could be wrong on the name. The Ii then
made the wearing of uniform armor their thing.

> When did this sort of thing start? Does anyone
> really know?

Essentially, when the Yamagata and Ii started doing
it. Prior to that, it was mainly only a concern to
equip your men with whatever you could--buying
matching sets of armor gets expensive. Earlier in the
16th cent daimyo would mark the armor they issued to
their ashigaru with their mon; that was probably the
beginning.

> Is it conceivable that a Shimazu daimyo of the 14thC
> might have
> equipped his men with black armour, if similar
> things were occurring
> in the 16thC?

Conceivable? I suppose. Not likely--at that point,
it'd be enough just to make sure they all had armor of
some sort. Usually the retainer himself was
responsible for his own armor.










__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com

[Previous #6501] [Next #6503]

#6503 [2005-01-11 15:09:43]

Re: Samurai Colours

by russcat9

Actually further research has found my last position to be false I
think, re: the Shimazu. Black and white sashimono only; their armour
in the 16thC being generally black due to the lacquer and lack of
coloured lace compared with earlier eras - no different from other clans.

The Ii wore red armour and lace in the 16thC, instigated by Obu
Toramasa (1504-1565) and his brother Yamagata Masakage who inherited
this "red regiment" (red armour and horse harness for everyone;
samurai, followers and ashigaru).

So my question should really be: was there any uniformity of lace
prior to the 16thC, or did it start with Obu Toramasa?

Cheers
Paul



--- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, "russcat9" wrote:
>
>
> In the 16thC the Shimazu were known to equip their warriors with black
> armour, much like the Ii and Sanada? with red.
>
> When did this sort of thing start? Does anyone really know?
>
> Is it conceivable that a Shimazu daimyo of the 14thC might have
> equipped his men with black armour, if similar things were occurring
> in the 16thC?
>
> Paul

[Previous #6502] [Next #6504]

#6504 [2005-01-11 15:11:01]

Re: Samurai Colours

by russcat9

Hi Nate

You're spot on I think - unlike my original post!

Cheers
Paul




--- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, Nate Ledbetter
wrote:
>
> --- russcat9 wrote:
>
> > In the 16thC the Shimazu were known to equip their
> > warriors with black
> > armour, much like the Ii and Sanada? with red.
>
> Not the Sanada, as far as I know. The Ii took the
> idea, I believe, from the troops of Yamagata
> Masakage--I could be wrong on the name. The Ii then
> made the wearing of uniform armor their thing.
>
> > When did this sort of thing start? Does anyone
> > really know?
>
> Essentially, when the Yamagata and Ii started doing
> it. Prior to that, it was mainly only a concern to
> equip your men with whatever you could--buying
> matching sets of armor gets expensive. Earlier in the
> 16th cent daimyo would mark the armor they issued to
> their ashigaru with their mon; that was probably the
> beginning.
>
> > Is it conceivable that a Shimazu daimyo of the 14thC
> > might have
> > equipped his men with black armour, if similar
> > things were occurring
> > in the 16thC?
>
> Conceivable? I suppose. Not likely--at that point,
> it'd be enough just to make sure they all had armor of
> some sort. Usually the retainer himself was
> responsible for his own armor.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
> http://my.yahoo.com

[Previous #6503] [Next #6505]

#6505 [2005-01-11 15:28:32]

Re: [samuraihistory] Re: Samurai Colours

by ltdomer98

--- russcat9 <snowcat9@...> wrote:

> Hi Nate
>
> You're spot on I think - unlike my original post!
>
> Cheers
> Paul

Amazing. I can remember that, but I can't remember to
bring home toilet paper from the store. I suppose
that's why my wife gets frustrated. *sigh*

It's important to keep in mind that it was a feudal
master-retainer relationship. I would take you into my
service, give you land or a stipend, etc. In return,
you'd provide military service--and that included
providing your own equipment, horse, weapons, armor,
and sub-retainers (your attendants, etc., depending on
your station) and their equipment. Since it's all
coming out of different pockets, it's highly unlikely
I would be able to tell all my retainers "You must all
be the same". You could standardize your band of 5
guys or so, but at that time, why? Even the sashimono
didn't really come into being prior to the end of the
Onin War, when armies got bigger and bigger and needed
clearer ways of identifying. Uniforms seem natural to
us today, but even in European armies, you didn't
really see uniforms until the late 17th/early 18th
centuries.




















__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page � Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com

[Previous #6504] [Next #6506]

#6506 [2005-01-11 15:28:46]

Re: [samuraihistory] Re: Samurai Colours

by ltdomer98

--- russcat9 <snowcat9@...> wrote:

> Hi Nate
>
> You're spot on I think - unlike my original post!
>
> Cheers
> Paul

Amazing. I can remember that, but I can't remember to
bring home toilet paper from the store. I suppose
that's why my wife gets frustrated. *sigh*

It's important to keep in mind that it was a feudal
master-retainer relationship. I would take you into my
service, give you land or a stipend, etc. In return,
you'd provide military service--and that included
providing your own equipment, horse, weapons, armor,
and sub-retainers (your attendants, etc., depending on
your station) and their equipment. Since it's all
coming out of different pockets, it's highly unlikely
I would be able to tell all my retainers "You must all
be the same". You could standardize your band of 5
guys or so, but at that time, why? Even the sashimono
didn't really come into being prior to the end of the
Onin War, when armies got bigger and bigger and needed
clearer ways of identifying. Uniforms seem natural to
us today, but even in European armies, you didn't
really see uniforms until the late 17th/early 18th
centuries.





















__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

[Previous #6505] [Next #6507]

#6507 [2005-01-11 16:30:54]

Re: Samurai Colours

by russcat9

Yes, it does frustrate people, I find. Lucky for me my wife is so
understanding!

Very good points about the relationship between lord and retainer. My
original thinking on the matter now resembles fantasy - a very cool
looking one mind!

Thanks
Paul


--- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, Nate Ledbetter
wrote:
>
> --- russcat9 wrote:
>
> > Hi Nate
> >
> > You're spot on I think - unlike my original post!
> >
> > Cheers
> > Paul
>
> Amazing. I can remember that, but I can't remember to
> bring home toilet paper from the store. I suppose
> that's why my wife gets frustrated. *sigh*
>
> It's important to keep in mind that it was a feudal
> master-retainer relationship. I would take you into my
> service, give you land or a stipend, etc. In return,
> you'd provide military service--and that included
> providing your own equipment, horse, weapons, armor,
> and sub-retainers (your attendants, etc., depending on
> your station) and their equipment. Since it's all
> coming out of different pockets, it's highly unlikely
> I would be able to tell all my retainers "You must all
> be the same". You could standardize your band of 5
> guys or so, but at that time, why? Even the sashimono
> didn't really come into being prior to the end of the
> Onin War, when armies got bigger and bigger and needed
> clearer ways of identifying. Uniforms seem natural to
> us today, but even in European armies, you didn't
> really see uniforms until the late 17th/early 18th
> centuries.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

[Previous #6506] [Next #6547]

#6547 [2005-01-18 04:13:22]

Re: [samuraihistory] Samurai Colours

by war3271200

Do you Know if the Tokugawa were loyal to the Imagawa?

Nate Ledbetter <ltdomer98@...> wrote:
--- russcat9 <snowcat9@...> wrote:

> In the 16thC the Shimazu were known to equip their
> warriors with black
> armour, much like the Ii and Sanada? with red.

Not the Sanada, as far as I know. The Ii took the
idea, I believe, from the troops of Yamagata
Masakage--I could be wrong on the name. The Ii then
made the wearing of uniform armor their thing.

> When did this sort of thing start? Does anyone
> really know?

Essentially, when the Yamagata and Ii started doing
it. Prior to that, it was mainly only a concern to
equip your men with whatever you could--buying
matching sets of armor gets expensive. Earlier in the
16th cent daimyo would mark the armor they issued to
their ashigaru with their mon; that was probably the
beginning.

> Is it conceivable that a Shimazu daimyo of the 14thC
> might have
> equipped his men with black armour, if similar
> things were occurring
> in the 16thC?

Conceivable? I suppose. Not likely--at that point,
it'd be enough just to make sure they all had armor of
some sort. Usually the retainer himself was
responsible for his own armor.










__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com




---
Samurai Archives: http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store: http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Previous #6507] [Next #6549]

#6549 [2005-01-18 14:57:59]

Re: [samuraihistory] Tokugawa loyal to Imagawa?

by ltdomer98

--- will rogers <war3271200@...> wrote:

>
> Do you Know if the Tokugawa were loyal to the
> Imagawa?

Depends on what you mean by "loyal". Did the
Matsudaira (they weren't the Tokugawa yet) do what
Imagawa Yoshimoto told them to do? Yes. Ieyasu was a
hostage at Sumpu, and unless they wanted him back in
pieces they didn't have a choice. Did they do it out
of loyalty to the Imagawa? Most decidely not. They
captivity of their young lord was a sore point for
many Mikawa bushi, from what I've read. Loyalty, to
me, implies a desire to serve. I doubt many Matsudaira
felt any desire to serve the Imagawa.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

[Previous #6547]


Made with