> Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma Rebellion of 1877 in oneDo
> of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The Last Samurai." This
> movie is scheduled to come out in December and from what I've seen
> it seems to be kind of accurate and very much like a James Clavell
> book (names changed and such). But what do you guys think of it?
> you think it has the potential to be up there with Shogun and TheShogun was based on pshudo historical fact, hence the historical
> Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood crapfest to make money
> and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
> Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma Rebellion of 1877 in oneDo
> of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The Last Samurai." This
> movie is scheduled to come out in December and from what I've seen
> it seems to be kind of accurate and very much like a James Clavell
> book (names changed and such). But what do you guys think of it?
> you think it has the potential to be up there with Shogun and The
> Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood crapfest to make money
> and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
> Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma Rebellion of 1877 in oneI look at going to it much as I do going to the dentist. I don't want to. I don't like it. I know it'll hurt. But I
> of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The Last Samurai." This
> movie is scheduled to come out in December and from what I've seen
> it seems to be kind of accurate and very much like a James Clavell
> book (names changed and such). But what do you guys think of it? Do
> you think it has the potential to be up there with Shogun and The
> Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood crapfest to make money
> and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
> Masamori Masami wrote:__________________________________
>
> > Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma
> Rebellion of 1877 in one
> > of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The
> Last Samurai." This
> > movie is scheduled to come out in December and
> from what I've seen
> > it seems to be kind of accurate and very much like
> a James Clavell
> > book (names changed and such). But what do you
> guys think of it? Do
> > you think it has the potential to be up there with
> Shogun and The
> > Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood
> crapfest to make money
> > and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
>
> I look at going to it much as I do going to the
> dentist. I don't want to. I don't like it. I know
> it'll hurt. But I
> have to go.
>
> Tony
>
>
>
> Agreed....I think it will be painful. Horribly Wrong.
> And that's on top of how I feel about Tom Cruise in
> general. It will be the pain of Shogun (the
> translations, the Edo-jidai uniform kimono, the
> silliness of the whole love story) on a much grander
> scale. It will hurt. It will kill me. And I will go.
>
> Nate
>
> --- "Anthony J. Bryant"wrote:
> > Masamori Masami wrote:
> >
> > > Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma
> > Rebellion of 1877 in one
> > > of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The
> > Last Samurai." This
> > > movie is scheduled to come out in December and
> > from what I've seen
> > > it seems to be kind of accurate and very much like
> > a James Clavell
> > > book (names changed and such). But what do you
> > guys think of it? Do
> > > you think it has the potential to be up there with
> > Shogun and The
> > > Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood
> > crapfest to make money
> > > and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
> >
> > I look at going to it much as I do going to the
> > dentist. I don't want to. I don't like it. I know
> > it'll hurt. But I
> > have to go.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> Is Shogun also a movie? I thought it was only a__________________________________
> book...
>
> What do you guys think of the Kurosawa samurai
> movies, are they
> historically accurate? I hear that Kagemusha is
> about using a double
> of Oda Nobunaga to hide his death. Was this fiction
> or are there at
> least some rumors to it?
>
> The Wolf of Mibu
>
>
> --- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, Nate
> Ledbetter
>wrote:
> > Agreed....I think it will be painful. Horribly
> Wrong.
> > And that's on top of how I feel about Tom Cruise
> in
> > general. It will be the pain of Shogun (the
> > translations, the Edo-jidai uniform kimono, the
> > silliness of the whole love story) on a much
> grander
> > scale. It will hurt. It will kill me. And I will
> go.
> >
> > Nate
> >
> > --- "Anthony J. Bryant"wrote:
> > > Masamori Masami wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma
> > > Rebellion of 1877 in one
> > > > of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The
> > > Last Samurai." This
> > > > movie is scheduled to come out in December and
> > > from what I've seen
> > > > it seems to be kind of accurate and very much
> like
> > > a James Clavell
> > > > book (names changed and such). But what do
> you
> > > guys think of it? Do
> > > > you think it has the potential to be up there
> with
> > > Shogun and The
> > > > Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood
> > > crapfest to make money
> > > > and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
> > >
> > > I look at going to it much as I do going to the
> > > dentist. I don't want to. I don't like it. I
> know
> > > it'll hurt. But I
> > > have to go.
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
> design software
> > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> Spoken like a true wargamer/masochist.__________________________________
>
> Bob Burke
>
> In a message dated 8/28/03 3:54:53 PM,
> ltdomer98@... writes:
>
> << Agreed....I think it will be painful. Horribly
> Wrong.
> And that's on top of how I feel about Tom Cruise in
> general. It will be the pain of Shogun (the
> translations, the Edo-jidai uniform kimono, the
> silliness of the whole love story) on a much grander
> scale. It will hurt. It will kill me. And I will go.
>
> Nate >>
>
>
> Hey there.__________________________________
> This may sound like dumb question, but AS A
> WORK OF FICTION, is Shogun
> any good? Or is it a mire of a story like I found
> Tale of the Heike to be?
> Just wondering, b/c I'm thinking of reading it.
> (And yes, I am planning to
> give Tale another honest try someday, just not right
> now.)
>
> Later
> Tim
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>
> Hey there.It depends on what you consider to be "fiction."
> This may sound like dumb question, but AS A WORK OF FICTION, is Shogun
> any good? Or is it a mire of a story like I found Tale of the Heike to be?
> Just wondering, b/c I'm thinking of reading it. (And yes, I am planning to
> give Tale another honest try someday, just not right now.)
>
> Is Shogun also a movie? I thought it was only a book...double
>
> What do you guys think of the Kurosawa samurai movies, are they
> historically accurate? I hear that Kagemusha is about using a
> of Oda Nobunaga to hide his death. Was this fiction or are thereat
> least some rumors to it?
>
> The Wolf of Mibu
>
>
> --- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, Nate Ledbetter
>wrote:
> > Agreed....I think it will be painful. Horribly Wrong.
> > And that's on top of how I feel about Tom Cruise in
> > general. It will be the pain of Shogun (the
> > translations, the Edo-jidai uniform kimono, the
> > silliness of the whole love story) on a much grander
> > scale. It will hurt. It will kill me. And I will go.
> >
> > Nate
> >
> > --- "Anthony J. Bryant"wrote:
> > > Masamori Masami wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma
> > > Rebellion of 1877 in one
> > > > of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The
> > > Last Samurai." This
> > > > movie is scheduled to come out in December and
> > > from what I've seen
> > > > it seems to be kind of accurate and very much like
> > > a James Clavell
> > > > book (names changed and such). But what do you
> > > guys think of it? Do
> > > > you think it has the potential to be up there with
> > > Shogun and The
> > > > Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood
> > > crapfest to make money
> > > > and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
> > >
> > > I look at going to it much as I do going to the
> > > dentist. I don't want to. I don't like it. I know
> > > it'll hurt. But I
> > > have to go.
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> Eponymous13@... wrote:__________________________________
>
> > Hey there.
> > This may sound like dumb question, but AS A
> WORK OF FICTION, is Shogun
> > any good? Or is it a mire of a story like I found
> Tale of the Heike to be?
> > Just wondering, b/c I'm thinking of reading it.
> (And yes, I am planning to
> > give Tale another honest try someday, just not
> right now.)
> >
>
> It depends on what you consider to be "fiction."
>
> To me, it fails greatly in the historical accuracy,
> historical verisimilitude, and linguistic accuracy
> (etc.) tests.
> To some people, that's not a problem.
>
> Let me give you an example. In the current issue of
> Hitchcock Magazine, there's a "Heian period" murder
> mystery. It's
> set in the eleventh century. Except I recognize the
> Japanese story used as the basis for it -- a story
> that took
> place a century later (because there was a war that
> figured in the background, and one of the characters
> is
> historical). I also recognized that the author made
> some anachronisms with names (using a very late
> period name for a
> woman character in the story). I was also thrown off
> because of mentions of cotton clothing and candles,
> neither of
> which existed in Japan during the Heian period.
> So.... is that a good story? To some, yes. To me,
> no. There was too
> much wrong with it that kept throwing me *out* of
> the story.
>
> Like some people stop reading detective fiction
> where someone puts a silencer on a revolver. Or
> removes "the clip"
> from a revolver. Both of which I see often -- it
> means the writer really doesn't know guns, and
> hasn't done the
> research -- it makes me wonder what else might be
> wrong that I *don't* know about.
>
> Tony
>
>
>
> You and I are pretty anal, though. I'll admit it--you?Oh, heck, yeah. Definitely.
>Hey, given the way things are going these days (oy...) that may come in more handy than you might imagine. Sigh...
> It's why I've been killing myself putting together a
> presentation for work--actually, 2. I'm tired of
> hearing soldiers say the north Koreans have x tank or
> y vehicle when they DON'T. So I've put together the
> mother of all north Korean and south Korean vehicle ID
> classes, with about 250 slides each. It's sick. My
> lieutenant thinks I'm obsessed. I probably am. But
> it's because people keep getting things WRONG...and
> I'm sick of it.
> You both may be anal, nate & tony, but I'd come to__________________________________
> you guys first if I had
> something in Japanese history that I didn't
> understand. And good luck on your
> projects, nate. :-D
>
> Tim
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>
> Eponymous13@... wrote:__________________________________
>
> > Hey there.
> > This may sound like dumb question, but AS A
> WORK OF FICTION, is Shogun
> > any good? Or is it a mire of a story like I found
> Tale of the Heike to be?
> > Just wondering, b/c I'm thinking of reading it.
> (And yes, I am planning to
> > give Tale another honest try someday, just not
> right now.)
> >
>
> It depends on what you consider to be "fiction."
>
> To me, it fails greatly in the historical accuracy,
> historical verisimilitude, and linguistic accuracy
> (etc.) tests.
> To some people, that's not a problem.
>
> Let me give you an example. In the current issue of
> Hitchcock Magazine, there's a "Heian period" murder
> mystery. It's
> set in the eleventh century. Except I recognize the
> Japanese story used as the basis for it -- a story
> that took
> place a century later (because there was a war that
> figured in the background, and one of the characters
> is
> historical). I also recognized that the author made
> some anachronisms with names (using a very late
> period name for a
> woman character in the story). I was also thrown off
> because of mentions of cotton clothing and candles,
> neither of
> which existed in Japan during the Heian period.
> So.... is that a good story? To some, yes. To me,
> no. There was too
> much wrong with it that kept throwing me *out* of
> the story.
>
> Like some people stop reading detective fiction
> where someone puts a silencer on a revolver. Or
> removes "the clip"
> from a revolver. Both of which I see often -- it
> means the writer really doesn't know guns, and
> hasn't done the
> research -- it makes me wonder what else might be
> wrong that I *don't* know about.
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>From: Nate Ledbetter <ltdomer98@...>_________________________________________________________________
>Reply-To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
>To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] The Last Samurai? Good? Bad?
>Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Agreed....I think it will be painful. Horribly Wrong.
>And that's on top of how I feel about Tom Cruise in
>general. It will be the pain of Shogun (the
>translations, the Edo-jidai uniform kimono, the
>silliness of the whole love story) on a much grander
>scale. It will hurt. It will kill me. And I will go.
>
>Nate
>
>--- "Anthony J. Bryant" <ajbryant@...> wrote:
> > Masamori Masami wrote:
> >
> > > Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma
> > Rebellion of 1877 in one
> > > of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The
> > Last Samurai." This
> > > movie is scheduled to come out in December and
> > from what I've seen
> > > it seems to be kind of accurate and very much like
> > a James Clavell
> > > book (names changed and such). But what do you
> > guys think of it? Do
> > > you think it has the potential to be up there with
> > Shogun and The
> > > Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood
> > crapfest to make money
> > > and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
> >
> > I look at going to it much as I do going to the
> > dentist. I don't want to. I don't like it. I know
> > it'll hurt. But I
> > have to go.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
>http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> I have a feeling I'm about to be stoned for heresy,_________________________________________________________________
> but despite all the
> historical inaccurasies can't you still enjoy the
> movie? I mean as a work of
> historical FICTION (you know, based on history but
> mostly made up). Not
> that I won't be bugged by all the little things too.
> I know I'll be sitting
> in the theater shaking my head muttering under my
> breath "no, no, OH
> gimmeabreak! that could NEVER happen, where did they
> get this information?"
> Most movies have been like that for me since I
> became somewhat obsessed with
> Micheal Crichton books :) Anyways, ya'll keep
> saying how you'll hate it but
> still see it. It will hurt. It won't kill me. I'll
> still go.
>
>
> >From: Nate Ledbetter <ltdomer98@...>
> >Reply-To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
> >To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] The Last Samurai?
> Good? Bad?
> >Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Agreed....I think it will be painful. Horribly
> Wrong.
> >And that's on top of how I feel about Tom Cruise in
> >general. It will be the pain of Shogun (the
> >translations, the Edo-jidai uniform kimono, the
> >silliness of the whole love story) on a much
> grander
> >scale. It will hurt. It will kill me. And I will
> go.
> >
> >Nate
> >
> >--- "Anthony J. Bryant" <ajbryant@...>
> wrote:
> > > Masamori Masami wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma
> > > Rebellion of 1877 in one
> > > > of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The
> > > Last Samurai." This
> > > > movie is scheduled to come out in December and
> > > from what I've seen
> > > > it seems to be kind of accurate and very much
> like
> > > a James Clavell
> > > > book (names changed and such). But what do
> you
> > > guys think of it? Do
> > > > you think it has the potential to be up there
> with
> > > Shogun and The
> > > > Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood
> > > crapfest to make money
> > > > and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
> > >
> > > I look at going to it much as I do going to the
> > > dentist. I don't want to. I don't like it. I
> know
> > > it'll hurt. But I
> > > have to go.
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
> design software
> >http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
>
>
> Enter for your chance to IM with Bon Jovi, Seal, Bow__________________________________
> Wow, or Mary J Blige
> using MSN Messenger
> http://entertainment.msn.com/imastar
>
>
> Yes! Yes! Yes!__________________________________
>
> How I'd love to have my own katana on hand to slash
> any idiot who interrupts
> the movie with some snide know-it-all "That couldn't
> happen!"
>
> Its movie, don't have a hissy fit!
>
>
> It's one thing when something "wrong" is done for
> cinematic effect. We all know that the Nagashino scene
> in "Kagemusha" isn't the way it really happened--the
> Takeda cavalry didn't die in a 9 minute span from
> rapid-fire Oda arqubusiers mowing them down like WWI
> German machine gunners against a British "Over the
> Top" Charge. But it fits the cinematic effect desired,
> so none of us complain about it. (And that's ignoring
> the red sky and all that, too)
>
> I'm anticipating that this will not be the case--not
> with Tom Cruise in it. They'll mess something up.
> Maybe it's just my natural bias against this time
> period, and the fact that I'm sure that there will be
> a gaudy amount of talk about Bushido and honor and
> stereotypical crap, and that some of the language will
> be wrong, and the costumes, and other things that
> aren't hard to get right will be wrong...
>
> But, I will go and see it, and might be surprised. And
> I might like it, despite whatever is wrong. I'm just
> not getting my hopes up.
>
> Nate
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> Shogun was a mini-series, 10 hours, and is coming out on DVD inof
> Sept. I also believe they made a shorter tv movie of Shogun, that
> probaly isnt that good since they would have to cut out 8-7 hours
> the storyline.due
>
> Kagemusha is infact about Takeda Shingen and how after he died,
> to a bullet wound, his head generals got a double to pretend to bemovie
> him. They managed to hide his death for a year, I believe. The
> has Nobunaga and Ieyasu in it, but its not about Nobunaga. By the
> way, this did actually happen.
>
> Ive seen a few Kurosawa films, and they seem very accurate. I
> recommend any Kurosawa film.
>
> --- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, "Saitoh Hajime"
>wrote:
> > Is Shogun also a movie? I thought it was only a book...
> >
> > What do you guys think of the Kurosawa samurai movies, are they
> > historically accurate? I hear that Kagemusha is about using a
> double
> > of Oda Nobunaga to hide his death. Was this fiction or are there
> at
> > least some rumors to it?
> >
> > The Wolf of Mibu
> >
> >
> > --- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, Nate Ledbetter
> >wrote:
> > > Agreed....I think it will be painful. Horribly Wrong.
> > > And that's on top of how I feel about Tom Cruise in
> > > general. It will be the pain of Shogun (the
> > > translations, the Edo-jidai uniform kimono, the
> > > silliness of the whole love story) on a much grander
> > > scale. It will hurt. It will kill me. And I will go.
> > >
> > > Nate
> > >
> > > --- "Anthony J. Bryant"wrote:
> > > > Masamori Masami wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma
> > > > Rebellion of 1877 in one
> > > > > of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The
> > > > Last Samurai." This
> > > > > movie is scheduled to come out in December and
> > > > from what I've seen
> > > > > it seems to be kind of accurate and very much like
> > > > a James Clavell
> > > > > book (names changed and such). But what do you
> > > > guys think of it? Do
> > > > > you think it has the potential to be up there with
> > > > Shogun and The
> > > > > Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood
> > > > crapfest to make money
> > > > > and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
> > > >
> > > > I look at going to it much as I do going to the
> > > > dentist. I don't want to. I don't like it. I know
> > > > it'll hurt. But I
> > > > have to go.
> > > >
> > > > Tony
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> > > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> You and I are pretty anal, though. I'll admit it--you?
> It's why I've been killing myself putting together a
> presentation for work--actually, 2. I'm tired of
> hearing soldiers say the north Koreans have x tank or
> y vehicle when they DON'T. So I've put together the
> mother of all north Korean and south Korean vehicle ID
> classes, with about 250 slides each. It's sick. My
> lieutenant thinks I'm obsessed. I probably am. But
> it's because people keep getting things WRONG...and
> I'm sick of it.
>
> Nate
>
> --- "Anthony J. Bryant"wrote:
> > Eponymous13@a... wrote:
> >
> > > Hey there.
> > > This may sound like dumb question, but AS A
> > WORK OF FICTION, is Shogun
> > > any good? Or is it a mire of a story like I found
> > Tale of the Heike to be?
> > > Just wondering, b/c I'm thinking of reading it.
> > (And yes, I am planning to
> > > give Tale another honest try someday, just not
> > right now.)
> > >
> >
> > It depends on what you consider to be "fiction."
> >
> > To me, it fails greatly in the historical accuracy,
> > historical verisimilitude, and linguistic accuracy
> > (etc.) tests.
> > To some people, that's not a problem.
> >
> > Let me give you an example. In the current issue of
> > Hitchcock Magazine, there's a "Heian period" murder
> > mystery. It's
> > set in the eleventh century. Except I recognize the
> > Japanese story used as the basis for it -- a story
> > that took
> > place a century later (because there was a war that
> > figured in the background, and one of the characters
> > is
> > historical). I also recognized that the author made
> > some anachronisms with names (using a very late
> > period name for a
> > woman character in the story). I was also thrown off
> > because of mentions of cotton clothing and candles,
> > neither of
> > which existed in Japan during the Heian period.
> > So.... is that a good story? To some, yes. To me,
> > no. There was too
> > much wrong with it that kept throwing me *out* of
> > the story.
> >
> > Like some people stop reading detective fiction
> > where someone puts a silencer on a revolver. Or
> > removes "the clip"
> > from a revolver. Both of which I see often -- it
> > means the writer really doesn't know guns, and
> > hasn't done the
> > research -- it makes me wonder what else might be
> > wrong that I *don't* know about.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> I have a feeling I'm about to be stoned for heresy, but despiteall the
> historical inaccurasies can't you still enjoy the movie? I mean asa work of
> historical FICTION (you know, based on history but mostly madeup). Not
> that I won't be bugged by all the little things too. I know I'llbe sitting
> in the theater shaking my head muttering under my breath "no, no,OH
> gimmeabreak! that could NEVER happen, where did they get thisinformation?"
> Most movies have been like that for me since I became somewhatobsessed with
> Micheal Crichton books :) Anyways, ya'll keep saying how you'llhate it but
> still see it. It will hurt. It won't kill me. I'll still go.J Blige
>
>
> >From: Nate Ledbetter
> >Reply-To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
> >To: samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: Re: [samuraihistory] The Last Samurai? Good? Bad?
> >Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Agreed....I think it will be painful. Horribly Wrong.
> >And that's on top of how I feel about Tom Cruise in
> >general. It will be the pain of Shogun (the
> >translations, the Edo-jidai uniform kimono, the
> >silliness of the whole love story) on a much grander
> >scale. It will hurt. It will kill me. And I will go.
> >
> >Nate
> >
> >--- "Anthony J. Bryant"wrote:
> > > Masamori Masami wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bob Burke recently brought up the Satsuma
> > > Rebellion of 1877 in one
> > > > of his posts, and this got me thinking of "The
> > > Last Samurai." This
> > > > movie is scheduled to come out in December and
> > > from what I've seen
> > > > it seems to be kind of accurate and very much like
> > > a James Clavell
> > > > book (names changed and such). But what do you
> > > guys think of it? Do
> > > > you think it has the potential to be up there with
> > > Shogun and The
> > > > Seven Samurai? Or is it just a big Hollywood
> > > crapfest to make money
> > > > and draw in crowds with big battle scenes?
> > >
> > > I look at going to it much as I do going to the
> > > dentist. I don't want to. I don't like it. I know
> > > it'll hurt. But I
> > > have to go.
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >__________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> >http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Enter for your chance to IM with Bon Jovi, Seal, Bow Wow, or Mary
> using MSN Messenger http://entertainment.msn.com/imastar
> You and I are pretty anal, though. I'll admit it--you?
> It's why I've been killing myself putting together a
> presentation for work--actually, 2. I'm tired of
> hearing soldiers say the north Koreans have x tank or
> y vehicle when they DON'T. So I've put together the
> mother of all north Korean and south Korean vehicle ID
> classes, with about 250 slides each. It's sick. My
> lieutenant thinks I'm obsessed. I probably am. But
> it's because people keep getting things WRONG...and
> I'm sick of it.
>
> Nate
> Well, I got my hands on what I have been told is a__________________________________
> very early draft
> of 'The Last Samurai', but although you have to keep
> in mind that it
> is an early draft (July 20th, 2001) there were some
> despicably
> typical mistakes. Here is an excerpt:
>
> ---------------------
> -JAMES starts to turn away. HIROSHI finally speaks.
>
> HIROSHI
> On the day of battle, a champion is chosen. He
> rides ahead of his
> army, meets the challenger of the enemy. The victor
> brings great
> acclaim to himself, to his clan. A dozen times I
> rode out as
> champion, a dozen men I killed. In only one contest
> did I know
> fear. Our combat seemed to last an eternity, by the
> grace of some
> god I prevailed... I had never been more proud to
> be samurai, to
> take an enemy's head. I raised it high on my
> pike... Learned later
> the warrior's son, a six-year old boy, had watched
> it all from the
> castle walls. That boy was Daigo Masakado.
> ----------------------
>
> That looks to me like something that would have been
> pretty much
> outdated even in the 15th century, let alone the
> 19th, and there is
> of course the obligatory trip to the geisha house.
> There are lots
> of things like that - some things that make it
> little better than
> the meiji-era samurai classic "the barbarian and the
> geisha".
> although, like I said, assuming this is truly an
> early version of
> the script, I HOPE they would have worked out the
> most obvious
> problems. The first scene of the movie, if they
> keep it as I have
> here, should be real good, though. The battle
> scenes have potential
> to say the least.
>
> --- In samuraihistory@yahoogroups.com, Nate
> Ledbetter
>wrote:
> > It's one thing when something "wrong" is done for
> > cinematic effect. We all know that the Nagashino
> scene
> > in "Kagemusha" isn't the way it really
> happened--the
> > Takeda cavalry didn't die in a 9 minute span from
> > rapid-fire Oda arqubusiers mowing them down like
> WWI
> > German machine gunners against a British "Over the
> > Top" Charge. But it fits the cinematic effect
> desired,
> > so none of us complain about it. (And that's
> ignoring
> > the red sky and all that, too)
> >
> > I'm anticipating that this will not be the
> case--not
> > with Tom Cruise in it. They'll mess something up.
> > Maybe it's just my natural bias against this time
> > period, and the fact that I'm sure that there will
> be
> > a gaudy amount of talk about Bushido and honor and
> > stereotypical crap, and that some of the language
> will
> > be wrong, and the costumes, and other things that
> > aren't hard to get right will be wrong...
> >
> > But, I will go and see it, and might be surprised.
> And
> > I might like it, despite whatever is wrong. I'm
> just
> > not getting my hopes up.
> >
> > Nate
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
> design software
> > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
>
>
>even though I'm sure it has manyMade up characters is one thing--that's what fiction
> historical flaws
> (including some of the main characters being made
> up) it treated the
> subject matter with respect and was very well done
> (it's one of my
> favorite), so now I have a lil bit more hope with
> Last Samurai...
>
> --- Saitoh Hajimewrote:
>
> >even though I'm sure it has many
> > historical flaws
> > (including some of the main characters being made
> > up) it treated the
> > subject matter with respect and was very well done
> > (it's one of my
> > favorite), so now I have a lil bit more hope with
> > Last Samurai...
>
> Made up characters is one thing--that's what fiction
> is all about. I don't expect a documentary, for
> heaven's sake. But I'm not encouraged by the script
> clip about the duel challenge...are you kidding me?
>
> Nate
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com