I tend to agree, Nobunaga was neither the unifier, or the first 'dictator', he wasn't even shogun. In terms of the question itself, surely a leader (anywhere) could be both dictator and unifier, they are not mutually exclusive terms.
Sprouting from the term 'unifier' though I have a question? When was Japan unified? Considering, Hokkaiko was really only geographically part of Japan until the 18th and 19th Centuries, despite incursions and expeditions into the north dating back to the Asuka-jidai, and before; while the Nansei (SW) Islands (Okinawa, etc) were not part of Japan until the first decades of the Edo-jidai.
M.Lorimer
"Anthony J. Bryant" <
ajbryant@...> wrote:
kentguy212002 wrote:
> oda nobunaga unifier of japan or first dictator of japan? steve
> turnbulls book seem to be divided on this anyone got a view
Frankly, he was neither. He wasn't a total unifier, and he was hardly the first
"dictator" -- whatever that may mean in feudal Japanese terms.
Tony
---
Samurai Archives:
http://www.samurai-archives.com
Samurai Archives store:
http://www.cafeshops.com/samuraiarchives
---
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/samuraihistory/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
samuraihistory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]